Larry Sanger constructed Wikipedia, and now he’s constructing his faith.
In a most in model blog submit, the 56-Twelve months-stale detailed his conversion to Christianity after many years of nonbelief.
“I spent over 35 years as a nonbeliever,” he wrote. “I will now not strive to portray myself as a converted ‘enemy of the faith.’ I never used to be; I was merely a skeptic.”
Now, he hopes to prevail in others cherish him—intellectuals who can also presumably be starting up to God nonetheless want more convincing.
Sanger has always had a repute for questioning the system. After launching Wikipedia in 2001, he distanced himself from the platform, calling it “share anarchy, share mob rule.” He has since turn out to be one in all its loudest critics, arguing that it’s controlled by ideological gatekeepers.
“There’s somewhat about a Nobel prize winners and infamous docs whose views are now not very most realistic now not welcome on Wikipedia—they’re literally censored on YouTube and in most cases Fb and Twitter [X] on story of they contradict the legend,” he told the Unusual York Publish.
But while he used to be busy tense net institutions, his non-public worldview used to be present process an overhaul. Raised in the Lutheran Church, he drifted from faith in his formative years after his father launched him to Unusual Age philosophies. His skepticism solidified in college at Reed—a college he describes as having the unofficial motto “Communism, Atheism, Free Admire.” He even reached out to a pastor with his doubts, very most realistic to be brushed off, which sealed the deal on his agnosticism.
Aloof, cracks started forming. He learned Unusual Atheist arguments unimpressive—“I scanned books produced by Unusual Atheists comparable to Dawkins and Harris and can aloof never ship myself to no doubt buy one: they were factual so transparently mediocre.” By 2011, he started publicly defending Christians in opposition to what he saw as unfair attacks, and in 2019, he picked up the Bible—now not as an act of faith, nonetheless as an mental sing. But something unexpected occurred.
“I was ashamed to realize that, no subject having a Ph.D. in philosophy, I had never truly understood what theology even is,” he wrote.
Now, after years of interior debates, Sanger has come to a firm conclusion: he believes the Bible is precise, God is ideal, and Jesus is the Savior of the enviornment. And on story of he can’t enact anything else midway, he’s spent the final five years writing God Exists: A Philosophical Case for the Christian God—a 200,000-be aware (and counting) deep dive into the mental basis for faith.
His key takeaway? “Every person can also aloof read the Bible everyday.”
For a man who once constructed the enviornment’s very most realistic starting up-supply encyclopedia, Sanger has arrived at a various form of truth—person that doesn’t depend on consumer edits.
by 
